Astronomers like Christine Chen are thrilled about the looming launch of the
James Webb Space Telescope.
The $10 billion instrument, half the size of a 737 airplane and replete with
gold-coated mirrors, will orbit 1 million miles from Earth and peer into
places humanity hasn't seen before. This includes some of the first stars
ever born, the most distant galaxies, and curious planets in the cosmos.
"It's really cool," marveled Chen, an astronomer at the Space Telescope
Science Institute, an organization that will run the James Webb Space
Telescope, or JWST.
The instrument's deeply-anticipated launch is currently set for Dec. 18,
2021, though in recent months the telescope has often been in the news for
reasons unrelated to its scientific endeavors. NASA named the remarkable
instrument after James Webb, NASA's leader in the 1960s who oversaw the
agency during a time when the federal government persecuted and fired LGBTQ
employees from NASA and other departments. It was a shameful time in
American history called the "Lavender Scare." For now, NASA said it will
keep the JWST label after finding no evidence about Webb that "warrants
changing the name."
JWST, originally dubbed the "Next Generation Space Telescope" in the 1990s,
will join the legendary Hubble Space Telescope in capturing clear views of
the universe from space. Hubble is a scientific treasure. Over the three
decades it's orbited 340 miles above Earth, Hubble has provided
unprecedented, brilliant views of the cosmos, galaxies, and planets. Yet
JWST is not a replacement for the aging Hubble. JWST is a successor, with
different, and advanced, abilities.
Here's what JWST, and ultimately you, will see that Hubble can't.
Seeing into the deep, deep past
Telescopes with bigger mirrors can see fainter objects. That's because
larger mirrors capture more light. Imagine particles of light as ping pong
balls, and a telescope's mirrors as a bucket. Hubble's mirror is around
eight feet in diameter, while JWST's mirror is much larger, at over 21 feet
in diameter.
"You're going to collect more ping pong balls," explained Jean Creighton, an
astronomer and the director of the Manfred Olson Planetarium at the
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
Capturing more light is critical for observing the earliest stars and
galaxies that formed in the universe, over 13 billion years ago. The
universe is incessantly expanding, meaning it's constantly grown or
stretched since its violent inception (the "Big Bang"), so the light from
these ancient parts of the cosmos is very, very, very far away (billions of
light-years). The most far-off light left stars billions of years ago, so
observing this light is like peering into the deep, deep past.
"We're looking back in time," said Chen. (Even when we look at our own star
— with protection — we're also peering into the past; it takes over eight
minutes for sunlight to reach Earth.)
"We're looking back in time."
And we'll see unprecedented things.
"We're going to see the very first stars and galaxies that ever formed,"
said Creighton. "We have not been able to do this with Hubble."
Hubble can see faint light that's about 1 billion years old. If all goes as
planned, JWST will see light that's nearly 13.7 billion years old, when the
earliest stars and planets started to form.
Lifting the veil
Hubble largely views light that humans can see (aka "visible light"). But
there are many types of light that our eyes can't see. JWST is specialized
to observe one of these, called "infrared," which allows astronomers to see
vastly more stars and planets.
How so?
The universe is filled with thick, smoke-like clouds of dust and gas. "That
obscures things," explained Jason Steffen, an assistant professor of physics
at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who researches planets outside our
solar system (aka exoplanets).
"It lifts the veil."
But infrared light can slip through thick clouds of dust. Infrared has
longer wavelengths than visible light, so the light waves don't get
scattered as much (and obscured) by particles in the universe. Longer
wavelengths, whose peaks and valleys are spread far apart, are less likely
to collide with particles in space.
The image comparison below, taken by Hubble, shows how infrared light slips
through cosmic dust. That's the Carina Nebula, a dazzling cloud of dust and
gas. Hubble's infrared view reveals the many stars hidden behind the dust.
"It lifts the veil," said Creighton.
What's more, viewing extremely distant galaxies and stars is made much
easier (or at times possible) by seeing them in infrared light. As described
earlier, the universe is constantly expanding, and the light traveling
through the cosmos stretches, too. "If you're looking at a distant galaxy,
that light has been stretched out," explained Steffen. The light's
wavelengths become longer.
That's a problem. "This can make distant objects very dim (or invisible) at
visible wavelengths of light, because that light reaches us as infrared
light," writes NASA. But JWST's infrared views make the invisible visible.
Super-Earths
There are few things in the universe more enthralling than exoplanets. Why,
some of these known planets, like "super-Earths" some two to 10 times the
size of our planet, might contain habitable, rocky environments, or even
water. JWST will spend a significant amount of time viewing exoplanets in
other star systems. (To JWST, these planets will appear as dots, not
grandiose, colorful planets.)
Already, NASA has confirmed finding over 4,500 exoplanets in the universe.
But with JWST's ability to peer through clouds of dust, the astronomer Chen
expects to find considerably more.
Crucially, JWST won't simply sleuth out the existence of exoplanets. It will
analyze their atmospheres. The telescope carries an instrument called a
spectrometer that can reveal what particles are composed of, based on how
light reacts with them. (Light passing through water vapor or oxygen, for
example, behaves in certain, well-known ways.)
Even a relatively unexciting spectrograph image can be considerably more
useful to astronomers than a brilliant picture. "There's a whole lot of
information," explained Creighton."It gives much more information than the
pretty picture does."
Of particular interest to scientists are the rocky, seven known planets
orbiting the star TRAPPIST-1, some 40 light-years (235 trillion miles) from
Earth. Perhaps JWST will discover a rocky planet that has hints of potential
life in its atmosphere, like the oxygen algae and plants breathe into our
air.
Before any of this cosmic science begins, however, JWST has a great, if not
daunting, journey ahead.
After a nail-biting launch (the robotic cargo is unusually precious), JWST
must make the 1 million-mile journey through space. Its tightly packed
hexagonal mirrors must unfold properly, and its tennis-court-sized sunshield
must unfurl as planned. And unlike with Hubble, astronauts can't launch into
space and fix any potential problems with the extremely distant telescope.
The launch looms large in the astronomical world. "Everyone's crossing their
fingers," said Steffen.
I am still baffled on why you still don't use metrics like the rest of the world. was sharing this article but it is useless to my palls here.
ReplyDeleteMetric sucks ! And not necessary. The way we use works fine and always did. Metric is for third world shithole countries.
Delete