Wormholes, or portals between black holes, may be stable after all, a wild
new theory suggests.

The findings contradict earlier predictions that these hypothetical
shortcuts through space-time would instantly collapse.

The sea change comes because tiny differences in the mathematics of
relativity, which is used to describe such wormholes, end up
dramatically changing our overall picture of how they behave.

### A game of metrics

First, some background on how general relativity operates. Relativity is
like a machine. Put in certain objects — say, a mass or an arrangement of
particles — and the machine spits out how that collection will behave over
time due to gravity. Everything in general relativity is based on movement
in space and time: Objects start at certain physical coordinates, they move
around, and they end up at other coordinates.

While the rules of general relativity are fixed, the theory itself provides
a lot of freedom to describe those coordinates mathematically. Physicists
call these different descriptions "metrics." Think of the metric as
different ways to describe g how to get to your grandma's house for
Thanksgiving. That may be street directions, satellite-based latitude and
longitude, or landmarks scribbled on a napkin. Your metric is different in
each case, but no matter which metric you choose, you end up at the big
feast.

Similarly, physicists can use different metrics to describe the same
situation, and sometimes one metric is more helpful than another — akin to
starting off with the street directions, but switching over to the napkin to
double-check if you're at the right landmark.

### The extended black hole

When it comes to black holes and wormholes, there are a few potential
metrics. The most popular one is the Schwarzschild metric, which is where
black holes were first discovered. But the Schwarzschild metric contains
some funky math. That metric misbehaves at a particular distance from the
black hole, a distance known today as the Schwarzschild radius or the event
horizon.

And by "misbehaves," we mean that metric completely breaks down, and it can
no longer distinguish between different points in space and time. But
there's another metric, called the Eddington-Finkelstein metric, that does
describe what happens to particles when they reach the event horizon: They
pass right through and fall into the black hole, never to be seen again.
What does all this have to do with wormholes? The simplest way to construct
a wormhole is to "extend" the idea of a black hole with its mirror image,
the white hole. This idea was first proposed by Albert Einstein and Nathan
Rosen, hence the reason wormholes are sometimes called "Einstein-Rosen
bridges." While black holes never let anything out, white holes never let
anything in. To make a wormhole, you just take a black hole and a white hole
and join their singularities (the points of infinite densities in their
centers). This creates a tunnel through space-time.

The result? A highly misbehaving tunnel.

### A narrow path

Once a theoretical wormhole exists, it's perfectly reasonable to ask what
would happen if someone actually tried to walk through it. That's where the
machinery of general relativity comes in: Given this (very interesting)
situation, how do particles behave? The standard answer is that wormholes
are nasty. White holes themselves are unstable (and likely don't even
exist), and the extreme forces within the wormhole force the wormhole itself
to stretch out and snap like a rubber band the moment it forms. And if you
try to send something down it? Well, good luck.

But Einstein and Rosen constructed their wormhole with the usual
Schwarzschild metric, and most analyses of wormholes use that same metric.
So physicist Pascal Koiran at Ecole Normale SupÃ©rieure de Lyon in France
tried something else: using the Eddington-Finkelstein metric instead. His
paper, described in October in the preprint database
arXiv, is
scheduled to be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Modern
Physics D.

Koiran found that by using the Eddington-Finkelstein metric, he could more
easily trace the path of a particle through a hypothetical wormhole.
He found that the particle can cross the event horizon, enter the wormhole
tunnel and escape through the other side, all in a finite amount of time.
The Eddington-Finkelstein metric didn't misbehave at any point in that
trajectory.

Does this mean that Einstein-Rosen bridges are stable? Not quite. General
relativity only tells us about the behavior of gravity, and not the other
forces of nature. Thermodynamics, which is the theory of how heat and energy
act, for example, tells us that white holes are unstable. And if physicists
tried to manufacture a black hole-white hole combination in the real
universe using real materials, other math suggests the energy densities
would break everything apart.

However, Koiran's result is still interesting because it points out that
wormholes aren't quite as catastrophic as they first appeared, and that
there may be stable paths through wormhole tunnels, perfectly allowed by
general relativity.

If only they could get us to grandma's faster.

## Reference:

Infall time in the Eddington–Finkelstein metric, with application to
Einstein–Rosen bridges by Pascal Koiran DOI: 10.1142/S0218271821501066