Professor Stephen Hawking’s final theory on the origin of the universe,
which he worked on in collaboration with Professor Thomas Hertog from KU
Leuven, was published in 2018 in the Journal of High Energy Physics.

The theory, which was submitted for publication before Hawking’s death
earlier in 2018, is based on string theory and predicts the universe is
finite and far simpler than many current theories about the big bang say.

Professor Hertog, whose work has been supported by the European Research
Council, first announced the new theory at a conference at the University of
Cambridge in July of 2017, organized on the occasion of Professor Hawking’s
75th birthday.

Modern theories of the big bang predict that our local universe came into
existence with a brief burst of inflation — in other words, a tiny fraction
of a second after the big bang itself, the universe expanded at an
exponential rate. It is widely believed, however, that once inflation
starts, there are regions where it never stops. It is thought that quantum
effects can keep inflation going forever in some regions of the universe so
that globally, inflation is eternal. The observable part of our universe
would then be just a hospitable pocket universe, a region in which inflation
has ended and stars and galaxies formed.

“The usual theory of eternal inflation predicts that globally our universe
is like an infinite fractal, with a mosaic of different pocket universes,
separated by an inflating ocean,” said Hawking in an interview in 2017. “The
local laws of physics and chemistry can differ from one pocket universe to
another, which together would form a multiverse. But I have never been a fan
of the multiverse. If the scale of different universes in the multiverse is
large or infinite the theory can’t be tested. ”

In their paper, Hawking and Hertog say this account of eternal inflation as
a theory of the big bang is wrong. “The problem with the usual account of
eternal inflation is that it assumes an existing background universe that
evolves according to Einstein’s theory of general relativity and treats the
quantum effects as small fluctuations around this,” said Hertog. “However,
the dynamics of eternal inflation wipes out the separation between classical
and quantum physics. As a consequence, Einstein’s theory breaks down in
eternal inflation.”

“We predict that our universe, on the largest scales, is reasonably smooth
and globally finite. So it is not a fractal structure,” said Hawking.

The theory of eternal inflation that Hawking and Hertog put forward is based
on string theory: a branch of theoretical physics that attempts to reconcile
gravity and general relativity with quantum physics, in part by describing
the fundamental constituents of the universe as tiny vibrating strings.
Their approach uses the string theory concept of holography, which
postulates that the universe is a large and complex hologram: physical
reality in certain 3D spaces can be mathematically reduced to 2D projections
on a surface.

Hawking and Hertog developed a variation of this concept of holography to
project out the time dimension in eternal inflation. This enabled them to
describe eternal inflation without having to rely on Einstein’s theory. In
the new theory, eternal inflation is reduced to a timeless state defined on
a spatial surface at the beginning of time.

“When we trace the evolution of our universe backwards in time, at some
point we arrive at the threshold of eternal inflation, where our familiar
notion of time ceases to have any meaning,” said Hertog.

Hawking’s earlier ‘no boundary theory’ predicted that if you go back in time
to the beginning of the universe, the universe shrinks and closes off like a
sphere, but this new theory represents a step away from the earlier work.
“Now we’re saying that there is a boundary in our past,” said Hertog.

Hertog and Hawking used their new theory to derive more reliable predictions
about the global structure of the universe. They predicted the universe that
emerges from eternal inflation on the past boundary is finite and far
simpler than the infinite fractal structure predicted by the old theory of
eternal inflation.

Their results, if confirmed by further work, would have far-reaching
implications for the multiverse paradigm. “We are not down to a single,
unique universe, but our findings imply a significant reduction of the
multiverse, to a much smaller range of possible universes,” said Hawking.

This makes the theory more predictive and testable.

Hertog now plans to study the implications of the new theory on smaller
scales that are within reach of our space telescopes. He believes that
primordial gravitational waves — ripples in spacetime — generated at the
exit from eternal inflation constitute the most promising “smoking gun” to
test the model. The expansion of our universe since the beginning means such
gravitational waves would have very long wavelengths, outside the range of
the current LIGO detectors. But they might be heard by the planned European
space-based gravitational wave observatory, LISA, or seen in future
experiments measuring the cosmic microwave background.

## Reference:

S.W. Hawking and Thomas Hertog. ‘A Smooth Exit from Eternal Inflation?’’
Journal of High-Energy Physics (2018).
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2018)147

Now the universe has pockets. Now we have a purpose for those strings. Just curious to see what the dress code is? "Mommy...why is the King not wearing any clothes?"

ReplyDeleteAt the moment I accept this answer and look forward to my body no longer working and I will know the answer once and for all. Death is a good thing.

ReplyDeleteI typed out a long comment and it got deleted when I tried to publish it. Hopefully a new Einstein will make themselves known. We need to answers to the questions being asked and they aren’t going to be found through traditional thinking.

ReplyDeleteI know I am not equal in IQ to these two, so it sounds as good as any other theory..if testable we may know soon after the James Webb Megascope sees a years worth of observations....boy one little Rock plowing through this unservicable scope would be the proof we never needed that Murphy knew what he was talking about....exiting time to be a science and astronomy buff...maybe the other 29 nations that teach science better than our politicians will allow....good thing the better equipped can explain the results to their disadvantaged American "scientists". Dem a ND better funding for all branches of education in the USA. WE deserve it. We did make it to the Moon, before the bad party stopped science funding, logic and critical thinking just to try to fool us into voting for them ..if you need help figuring which Party must convince fools of obvious muckraking their opponents while offering zero solutions....but it is a bigger sin to belong to that source of ignorance than to be fooled into agreeing with them. But let's hope, someday We will stop voting b for obvious liars and criminals. Insults are for the immature. I am a duck when badmouthed by people I already have zero respect for.Make me laugh. Besides I already know scientists are usually smarter than the rest of us. If you distrust science, well ther not much to discuss...

ReplyDeleteIgor Randolph

ReplyDelete